<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quartz vs Mechanical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/20/quartz-vs-mechanical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/20/quartz-vs-mechanical/</link>
	<description>watchweblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Rees</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/20/quartz-vs-mechanical/comment-page-1/#comment-99150</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=100#comment-99150</guid>
		<description>I'm sort of a techno-geek myself, earning my living with a computer.  But I wear a Titoni automatic (mechanical) watch.  I guess I just like to keep one small area of my life immune to the ravages of the digital revolution.  I'm not quite sure why, but a mechanical watch is just more of a "real" watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sort of a techno-geek myself, earning my living with a computer.  But I wear a Titoni automatic (mechanical) watch.  I guess I just like to keep one small area of my life immune to the ravages of the digital revolution.  I&#8217;m not quite sure why, but a mechanical watch is just more of a &#8220;real&#8221; watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. V N Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/20/quartz-vs-mechanical/comment-page-1/#comment-53475</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. V N Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=100#comment-53475</guid>
		<description>HOW COME MECHANICAL WATCHES COME BACK IN UPPER END MODELS?inspite of weight and less accurate. Any improvement made in per second vibrations from the earlier 33/sec?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW COME MECHANICAL WATCHES COME BACK IN UPPER END MODELS?inspite of weight and less accurate. Any improvement made in per second vibrations from the earlier 33/sec?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mARKO</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/20/quartz-vs-mechanical/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>mARKO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=100#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>quartz is deffinitively better...you buy wrist watcth and you wear it for 15-20 years and then buy another one...thats simple...because it is more precise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quartz is deffinitively better&#8230;you buy wrist watcth and you wear it for 15-20 years and then buy another one&#8230;thats simple&#8230;because it is more precise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
