<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch auction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/25/watch-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/25/watch-auction/</link>
	<description>watchweblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: georges zaslavsky</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2004/10/25/watch-auction/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>georges zaslavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=105#comment-60</guid>
		<description>sorry but this daytona doesn't desserve more than 1800? I don't care if it is rare, it has a shitty valjoux 72 movment so I can't consider it as good quality watch. the daytona was always too over priced</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry but this daytona doesn&#8217;t desserve more than 1800? I don&#8217;t care if it is rare, it has a shitty valjoux 72 movment so I can&#8217;t consider it as good quality watch. the daytona was always too over priced</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
