<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Bond watches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2009/01/03/james-bond-watches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2009/01/03/james-bond-watches/</link>
	<description>One of the best read watch blogs avialable, since 2004. FratelloWatches covers watch reviews, industry news, watch accessories, famous wearers and lots more!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:07:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dell Deaton, www.jbw007.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2009/01/03/james-bond-watches/comment-page-1/#comment-173543</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell Deaton, www.jbw007.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/?p=994#comment-173543</guid>
		<description>In re-reading your Post here again, Robert-Jan, I was struck again by just how often folks assume understanding - based on someone else&#039;s understanding.

Not only are there a lot of &quot;unknown&quot; James Bond watches, but also a lot of people to whom it would never occur to think there were unknowns. &quot;The &#039;Dr. No&#039; watch,&quot; for example, turns out to be a stumbling block, because the all-but exclusive focus on Bond&#039;s first on-the-big-screen Rolex Submariner misses the fact that the first watch he&#039;s actually seen wearing on that screen couldn&#039;t possibly be a Sub! (It&#039;s what I call &quot;The Sylvia Trench watch.&quot;) 

That thought-bias continues to &quot;You Only Live Twice,&quot; where it would appear that actually watching the movies wasn&#039;t felt a necessity before simply assuming that Agent 007 wears a Rolex Submariner in that one. (Note: He does not.)

Yeah, my interest is in James Bond watches--. That&#039;s not for everyone, I know. But the attention to detail, the interest in getting it &quot;right,&quot; well, I think that applies to whatever one&#039;s passion and interest. So I&#039;m overjoyed to find common ground, even if only on the fringes. Besides, if you truly enjoy the persuit, as I do, why cut it short?

That&#039;s why we&#039;re here!

Dell Deaton
www.jamesbondwatches.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re-reading your Post here again, Robert-Jan, I was struck again by just how often folks assume understanding &#8211; based on someone else&#8217;s understanding.</p>
<p>Not only are there a lot of &#8220;unknown&#8221; James Bond watches, but also a lot of people to whom it would never occur to think there were unknowns. &#8220;The &#8216;Dr. No&#8217; watch,&#8221; for example, turns out to be a stumbling block, because the all-but exclusive focus on Bond&#8217;s first on-the-big-screen Rolex Submariner misses the fact that the first watch he&#8217;s actually seen wearing on that screen couldn&#8217;t possibly be a Sub! (It&#8217;s what I call &#8220;The Sylvia Trench watch.&#8221;) </p>
<p>That thought-bias continues to &#8220;You Only Live Twice,&#8221; where it would appear that actually watching the movies wasn&#8217;t felt a necessity before simply assuming that Agent 007 wears a Rolex Submariner in that one. (Note: He does not.)</p>
<p>Yeah, my interest is in James Bond watches&#8211;. That&#8217;s not for everyone, I know. But the attention to detail, the interest in getting it &#8220;right,&#8221; well, I think that applies to whatever one&#8217;s passion and interest. So I&#8217;m overjoyed to find common ground, even if only on the fringes. Besides, if you truly enjoy the persuit, as I do, why cut it short?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re here!</p>
<p>Dell Deaton<br />
<a href="http://www.jamesbondwatches.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamesbondwatches.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bond watches &#124; Blogflock Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2009/01/03/james-bond-watches/comment-page-1/#comment-158191</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bond watches &#124; Blogflock Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/?p=994#comment-158191</guid>
		<description>[...] Just dual days ago, we perceived an e-mail from Dell over during www.jamesbondwatches.com revelation me which he is in a swell of formulating a many extensive list.   Here is a original:  James Bond watches [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just dual days ago, we perceived an e-mail from Dell over during <a href="http://www.jamesbondwatches.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamesbondwatches.com</a> revelation me which he is in a swell of formulating a many extensive list.   Here is a original:  James Bond watches [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
