<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaeger-LeCoultre Mark 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11</link>
	<description>One of the best read watch blogs avialable, since 2004. FratelloWatches covers watch reviews, industry news, watch accessories, famous wearers and lots more!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyC</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/comment-page-1/#comment-196548</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/#comment-196548</guid>
		<description>I have a MK11 JLC Ex RAAF watch I have had for a little over 12 years. 
I have worn it as an everyday watch since i purchased it. 
It is a sturdy and unbelievably accurate timepiece and has only required servicing twice. 

as Ferris said: &quot;If you have the means i suggest you pick one up&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a MK11 JLC Ex RAAF watch I have had for a little over 12 years.<br />
I have worn it as an everyday watch since i purchased it.<br />
It is a sturdy and unbelievably accurate timepiece and has only required servicing twice. </p>
<p>as Ferris said: &#8220;If you have the means i suggest you pick one up&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Chistoni</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/comment-page-1/#comment-135198</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Chistoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/#comment-135198</guid>
		<description>A really interesting site,with many intelligent explanations and beautiful pics,showing how marvellous were those mechanical work of art things !

Congratulations

Gabriel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting site,with many intelligent explanations and beautiful pics,showing how marvellous were those mechanical work of art things !</p>
<p>Congratulations</p>
<p>Gabriel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/comment-page-1/#comment-72509</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/#comment-72509</guid>
		<description>These JLCs are very collectible since so few were made compared to those produced by IWC at that time - only 2,950 according to the official count. By coincidence I found the same tracking site myself a while ago and posted on it too! (http://www.harrybishop.ca/?p=314).

I really like these vintage basic layout pilot style watches. This one - manual wind, chronometer grade, and low production - is a wonderful example.

Thanks as always for the great posts.
Cheers
Harry
http://www.harrybishop.ca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These JLCs are very collectible since so few were made compared to those produced by IWC at that time &#8211; only 2,950 according to the official count. By coincidence I found the same tracking site myself a while ago and posted on it too! (<a href="http://www.harrybishop.ca/?p=314" rel="nofollow">http://www.harrybishop.ca/?p=314</a>).</p>
<p>I really like these vintage basic layout pilot style watches. This one &#8211; manual wind, chronometer grade, and low production &#8211; is a wonderful example.</p>
<p>Thanks as always for the great posts.<br />
Cheers<br />
Harry<br />
<a href="http://www.harrybishop.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.harrybishop.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert-Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/comment-page-1/#comment-72483</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert-Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/#comment-72483</guid>
		<description>It is a great site, never noticed it before. The cases on these watches are really magnificent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a great site, never noticed it before. The cases on these watches are really magnificent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meisenzahl</title>
		<link>http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/comment-page-1/#comment-72481</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meisenzahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fratellowatches.com/archives/2008/02/15/jaeger-lecoultre-mark-11/#comment-72481</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s a great site, been around for a while. Those old JLCs are classic and beauties imho. I much prefer them to the IWC models of the last decade or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s a great site, been around for a while. Those old JLCs are classic and beauties imho. I much prefer them to the IWC models of the last decade or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->